“ART AS A RIGHT” ABOUT THE TENSIONS BETWEEN POPULAR ART AND THE ACCESS TO ITS DECODIFICATION

Main Article Content

Patricia HERRERO

Abstract

The intention of this piece of work is to show that: -The art category was built around different speeches to be able to characterize today from different points of view the state of this matter, -Finding clues to talk about certain concepts imposed by European imposition and be objective about the lack of theoretical actualization around the field of critical approaches that update the discriminatory use of hundreds of different terms coined by the illustration and that up to now hasn’t been denoted in front of epistemological breakages of different theoretical approaches, anthropological, sociological, linguistic, semiotic, aesthetic, etc in a Latin American context, -Recognize the popular art as a theoretical-practical construction that sho popular Latin American productions, -To put in evidence the absence of an artistic education that starts earlier (for children) that legitimate this distinction signs because only “a few” have access “to read” the artistic codes instead of encoding “art”.
The popular art codes are the ones that go round in the streets. For this reason, I tackle the concept of “Folklore” as a non social discourse from a semiotic frame to show the visibility-invisibility of certain popular artistic activities which are not considered as “Art”. Apart from that this activities have a particular aesthetic production neither less nor more important that others.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Article Details

How to Cite
HERRERO, P. (2011). “ART AS A RIGHT” ABOUT THE TENSIONS BETWEEN POPULAR ART AND THE ACCESS TO ITS DECODIFICATION. Cuadernos FHyCS-UNJu, (39), 141–154. Retrieved from https://revistas.fhycs.unju.edu.ar/revistacuadernos/index.php/cuadernos/article/view/11
Section
Original articles
Author Biography

Patricia HERRERO, Escuela de Arte - Facultad de Filosofía y Humanidades - Universidad Nacional de Córdoba - Córdoba

The intention of this piece of work is to show that: -The art category was built around different speeches to be able to characterize today from different points of view the state of this matter, -Finding clues to talk about certain concepts imposed by European imposition and be objective about the lack of theoretical actualization around the field of critical approaches that update the discriminatory use of hundreds of different terms coined by the illustration and that up to now hasn’t been denoted in front of epistemological breakages of different theoretical approaches, anthropological, sociological, linguistic, semiotic, aesthetic, etc in a Latin American context, -Recognize the popular art as a theoretical-practical construction that sho popular Latin American productions, -To put in evidence the absence of an artistic education that starts earlier (for children) that legitimate this distinction signs because only “a few” have access “to read” the artistic codes instead of encoding “art”.

The popular art codes are the ones that go round in the streets. For this reason, I tackle the concept of “Folklore” as a non social discourse from a semiotic frame to show the visibility-invisibility of certain popular artistic activities which are not considered as “Art”. Apart from that this activities have a particular aesthetic production neither less nor more important that others.

References

ACHA, J; COLUMBRES, AT (1991) Hacia una Teoría Latinoamericana del Arte. Editorial Del Sol.

BLACHE, M y J MAGARIÑOS DE MORENTIN (1993) El contexto de la actuación en la narrativa folklórica. Revista de Investigaciones Folklóricas. No. 8 Buenos Aires, Sección Folklore, UBA.

BLACHE, M y MAGARIÑOS DE MORENTIN, J (1992) “Enunciados fundamentales tentativos para la definición del concepto de Folklore 12 años después” Revista de Investigaciones Folklóricas 7, Buenos Aires, Sección Folklore, UBA.

BLACHE M y MAGARIÑOS DE MORENTIN, J (1991) “Lineamientos metodológicos para el estudio de la narrativa folklórica” Revista de Investigaciones Folklóricas, No.6, Buenos Aires, Sección Folklore, UBA.

BOURDIEU, P (1967) Los estudiantes y la Cultura. Bs. As.; Labor.

BOURDIEU, P (1996) La reproducción: Elementos para una teoría del sistema de enseñanza. México: Fontamaro.

BOURDIEU, P (1997) Las reglas del Arte. Barcelona. Editorial Anagrama.

BOURDIEU, P (1988) Sociología y Cultura. Editorial México.

BOURDIEU, P (2003) Creencias Artísticas y Bienes Simbólicos. Editorial Aurelia Rivera.

BOURDIEU, P (1998) La Distinción. Criterios y bases sociales del gusto. Editorial Tarurs.

BOURDIEU, P (1992) Las reglas del Arte. Génesis y estructura del campo literario. Editorial Anagrama. Barcelona.

BOVISIO, MA (2002) Arte ¿vs? artesanía, Editorial FIAAR, Buenos Aires.

CORTAZAR A (1975) Los fenómenos folklóricos y su contexto humano y cultural. Teorías de Folklore en América Latina Editorial Caracas INIDEF.

CORTAZAR, A (1959) Esquema del Folklore: conceptos y Métodos. Bs. As. Columba.

ESCOBAR, T (1987) El mito del arte, el mito del pueblo, Editorial Asunción Peroni.

FOUCAULT, M. (1975) Vigilar y Castigar. Editorial SXXI

FOUCAULT, M Discurso, Poder y Subjetividad. Editorial El Cielo por Asalto.

GUTIÉRREZ, A. (1997) Las prácticas Sociales. Editorial U. N. Misiones.

GIROUX, H (1995) Teoría y resistencia en educación. Editorial SXXI.

GEERTZ, C (1987) La interpretación de las culturas, Editorial GEDISA, México.

GEERTZ, C Conocimiento Local. Editorial GEDISA, México.

GRAMSCI, A (1967) Observaciones sobre Folklore. Literatura y vida nacional Madrid, Península.

LOMBARDI, S (1975) Antropología cultural. Análisis de la cultura subalternas Editorial Galerna, Buenos Aires.

LAUER, M (1982) Crítica de la artesanía. Plástica y sociedad en los Andes peruanos, Editorial DESCO, Lima.

MAGARIÑOS DE MORENTIN, J (1993) El contexto de interpretación «Revista de Investigaciones Folklóricas, No. 8, Buenos Aires. Sección Folklore, UBA.

Similar Articles

<< < 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.