Bioclimatology: Thermal Comfort in Different Urban and Rural Environments
Main Article Content
Abstract
Atmospheric factors are a fundamental part of the environment, and it is therefore important to understand the changes that occur when the conditions of each climatic element vary. All these environmental factors obviously influence human well-being and, under extreme conditions, may affect the health of the population, a tendency that becomes more pronounced in urban areas.
The purpose of this study is to compare the behavior of the meteorological elements that determine different levels of comfort in urban and rural environments, based on a bioclimatic index.
Temperature and relative humidity data were obtained from one meteorological station located in the city center and another located in an area with rural characteristics near the city. The spatial distribution of thermal and hygrometric values was determined through mobile measurements carried out along transects using vehicles.
The monthly distribution of comfort categories in the urban and rural sites shows the urban effect, since from October to March days categorized as “very hot” appear in the urban area, whereas this category was not recorded in the rural sector in any month. Comfort sensations show the greatest contrasts between siesta time and night during the summer season, establishing important differences among urban, suburban, and rural environments. These differences result from the orographic effect and from differences in soil structure, which play an important role in reducing the thermal effect.
Downloads
Article Details

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
The author/s grant exclusive license without temporary limit for the manuscript to be published in Cuadernos-FHyCS edited by Humanides the Faculty of Social Science, National University of Jujuy.
References
Barry, R. G. y Chorley, R. J. (1968 [1985]) Atmósfera, tiempo y clima. (Trad. de la 4.ª ed. en inglés). Barcelona, Editorial Omega.
Capelli de Steffens, A., Piccolo, M. C. y Campo de Ferreras, A. (1991) El confort estival de Bahía Blanca. En: Anales del VI Congreso Argentino de Meteorología (CONGREMET VI). Buenos Aires, Centro Argentino de Meteorólogos (CAM), pp. 117-118.
Coronel, A. y Piacentini, R. D. (1991) Comportamiento higrotérmico de la ciudad de Rosario (Pampa Húmeda argentina) en el período estival. En: Anales del VI Congreso Argentino de Meteorología (CONGREMET VI). Buenos Aires, Centro Argentino de Meteorólogos (CAM), pp. 123-124.
Givoni, B. (1989) Urban Design in Different Climates. Geneva, World Meteorological Organization (World Climate Programme Applications and Services, WCAP-10 / WMO/TD-N.º 346).
Jendritzky, G. y Nübler, W. (1981) A model analysing the urban thermal environment in physiologically significant terms. Archives for Meteorology, Geophysics, and Bioclimatology (Series B), 29, (4), pp. 313-326.
Landsberg, H. E. (1981) The Urban Climate. New York, Academic Press (International Geophysics Series, Vol. 28).
Scarpati, O. E., Spescha, L. y Quintela, R. M. (1994) Aplicación de un índice bioclimático a zonas húmedas y subhúmedas del Mercosur. Contribuciones Científicas - GAEA, 55 (Semana de la Geografía - Congreso Nacional de Geografía), pp. 294-301. Rosario, Sociedad Argentina de Estudios Geográficos.
Smith, K. (1975) Principles of Applied Climatology. London, McGraw-Hill.
Smith, K. (1984) Environmental issues. Progress in Physical Geography, 8, (1), pp. 139-146.
Terjung, W. H. (1967) The geographical application of some selected physio-climatic indices to Africa. International Journal of Biometeorology, 11, (1), pp. 5-19.
Terjung, W. H. (1968) World patterns of the distribution of the monthly comfort index. International Journal of Biometeorology, 12, (2), pp. 119-151.