PIERRE BOURDIEU´ READINGS AND READER. LESSONS AND AMBIGUITIES FROM FRANCE AND AMERICA
Main Article Content
Abstract
In this work, we propose some elements for the interpretation of Pierre Bourdieu´s sociology, through exploring the sides of readers and readings done around his work in France and the United States. This is an attempt to locate them in any conditions on which they were done and the readers situated, linking certain senses given to Bourdieu´s texts with these reading operations, intellectual an affective at the same time. In this way, just the involvement in a field, on which Bourdieu had a position and position takings particularly controversial, as the frequently unknown distance of the other’s intellectual context, seen from a dominant position, conspire against the innovative sociological work comprehension in any of the cases.
Downloads
Article Details
The author/s grant exclusive license without temporary limit for the manuscript to be published in Cuadernos-FHyCS edited by Humanides the Faculty of Social Science, National University of Jujuy.
References
AMIOT, M (1986) Contre l´État, les sociologues. Éléments pour une sociologie urbaine en France (1900-1980), Paris, EHESS.
ANSART, P (1990)Les sociologies contemporaines. Paris, Seuil.
BOURDIEU, P (1963) Et Darbel, Alain. Travail et travailleurs en Algérie, Mouton.
BOURDIEU, P (1987) Choses dites. Minuit.
BOURDIEU, P (1988) “Vive la crise! For heterodoxy in social science.” En Theory and society 17, N 5 (september): 773-88.
BOURDIEU, P (1993) “For a sociogenetic understanding.” En Calhoun, C et alii Bourdieu Critical Perspectives. University of Chicago Press, 1993.
BOURDIEU, P (1997) Méditations pascaliennes. Paris, Seuil.
BOURDIEU, P (2000) Poder, derecho y clases sociales. Bilbao, Desclée.
BOURDIEU, P (2001) Science de la science et reflexivité. Paris, Raisons d’Agir,
BOURDIEU, P (2006) Autoanálisis de un sociólogo. Barcelona, Anagrama.
BOUVERESSE, J (2002) “Celui qui dérangeait” en Le Monde 30.01.02
BRUBAKER, R (1993) “Social theory as habitus.” En en Calhoum,C; LiPuma, E; Postone, M. Bourdieu. Critical perspectivas. University of Chicago Press.
DANIEL, J (2002) “Éditoriale” en Le Nouvel Observateur, semaine de jeudi 31 janvier N 1943.
HARKER, R; MAHAR and WILKES (1990) An introduction to the work of Pierre Bourdieu. The practice of theory. Macmillan.
HARKER, R (1990) “Education and reproduction.” In Harker, R.; Cheleeb Mahar and Chris Wilkes An introduction to the work of Pierre Bourdieu. The practice of theory. Macmillan.
Héritier, F (2002) “Une inlassable exigence” en Le Monde, 25-01-02
LAHIRE, B (sous la direction de) (2001) Le travail sociologique de Pierre Bourdieu. Dettes et critiques. Paris, La Découverte.
MARTINEZ, AT (2007) Pierre Bourdieu, razones y lecciones de una práctica sociológica. Buenos Aires, Manantial.
MAUGER, G (1994) “Questions à Pierre Bourdieu”, en Mauger, Gérard et Louis Pinto. Lire les sciences sociales. 1989-1992. Vol. I Paris, Belin.
PINTO, L (1999) Pierre Bourdieu et la théorie du monde social. Paris, Albim Michel.
SWARTZ, D (1997) Culture and power. The sociology of Pierre Bourdieu. Chicago, University of Chicago Press.
WACQUANT, L (1992) “Introduction” en Bourdieu y Wacquant, Réponses. Paris, Seuil,
WACQUANT, L (1993) “Bourdieu in America” En en Calhoum,C; LiPuma, E; Postone, M. Bourdieu. Critical perspectives. Chicago, University of Chicago Press.
WACQUANT, L (1995) “Durkheim et Bourdieu: le socle commun et ses fissures.” En Critique, TomeLI. N 579-580 pág. 646-660.
WACQUANT, L (2002) “La vie sociologique de Pierre Bourdieu.” En Politique. Revue européenne de débat, automne 2002.
WACQUANT, L (2002) “Un savant inventif et iconoclaste.” En Le monde. 27-01-02.
WACQUANT, L (2003) “Notes tardives sur le “marxisme” de Bourdieu” 8-11-03. http:// www.homme-oderne.org/societe/socio/wacquant/pbnotar.html